|
Spring 2000
- In Philadelphia's 24th police district in 1998, there were 12
murder victims between the ages of 7-24. There were two in 1999.
- Baltimore's Park Heights District usually averages 20 violent
incidences per week. In the eight weeks just before press time,
there were a total of four.
Because they represent small geographic areas and the trends are
so recent, these two bits of good news can only be viewed as anecdotes
without definitive causes. They suggest, however, that Philadelphia
Safe and Sound and Baltimore's Safe and Sound Campaign are on the
right track with their anti-violence strategies.
Working with large coalitions with members from the criminal justice
arena, social services, the faith community, neighborhood groups
and others, these two local Urban Health Initiative campaigns are
attacking youth violence through a strategy that combines strict
law enforcement with supporting services. It is initially being
applied in specific neighborhoods, but will expand to other parts
of the cities over time.
Known as the Youth Violence Reduction Project in Philadelphia and
Operation Safe Neighborhoods in Baltimore, the strategies are based
on Boston's Operation Cease Fire, which is credited with producing
dramatic results against Boston's epidemic of violence. Murders
of victims aged 24 and under (Baltimore and Philadelphia also target
this age group) fell more than 70% in Boston in the two years after
Operation Cease Fire began. David Kennedy, senior researcher at
Harvard University and a key architect of Operation Cease Fire,
consults for Baltimore's and Philadelphia's initiatives.
Hathaway Ferebee, executive director of Baltimore's Safe and Sound
Campaign, says the strategy involves two promises to the community.
"The first promise is that violent behavior is no longer tolerated,"
she says. "The second is that we will help those who might
otherwise engage in this type of behavior to turn their lives around."
Promise 1: Stop it, or else
Implementation begins with gathering and analyzing data to an extent
rare in crime fighting. Doing this legwork is difficult and time
consuming, but it enhances the effectiveness of the strategy. Among
other things, it pinpoints where violence most often occurs, identifies
the most likely perpetrators and victims of violence, highlights
areas in the most need of additional probation and social services,
and shows the level of commitment needed to improve the situation.
With analysis that identifies the relatively few individuals responsible
for the majority of violence and the locales where it occurs the
most, police, probation officers, prosecutors and the courts lead
the new, intolerant attitude toward violence.
"Call-ins" are held during which likely perpetrators
are given the unmistakable message that violence will no longer
be tolerated. Clear standards for behavior are set with the promise
that every "lever" legally available will be used when
those standards are violated.
These levers include, for example, the serving of outstanding warrants,
vehicle impounding, strict probation and parole enforcement, stronger
bail term requests, the possibility of very severe federal prosecution
and stiffer plea bargains.
Probation often includes specific restrictions involving geography
(e.g., perpetrator can't be on the corner of streets X and Y, an
area known for drug activity) or peers (e.g., perpetrator can't
associate with specific individuals). Police and probation officers
provide strict surveillance of these "youth partners".
"This changes the game dramatically," says Ferebee. "Perpetrators
now know that the cost of violent behavior has soared. Rather than
the response to violence being uncertain, slow, often not very severe,
it has become certain, rapid and severe. This is an efficient way
to conduct law enforcement - it's strategic, targeted at behavior
and brings together different parts of the system."
Promise 2: We'll help
In addition to law enforcement, members of the coalitions in Baltimore
and Philadelphia are service providers, clergy, community residents
and others who participate in the call-ins and help those involved
in violence and their families to turn their lives around.
"We can't arrest our way out of the problem," says Naomi
Post, executive director of Philadelphia Safe and Sound, "so
we also support the people who want out." These avenues out
include alternative education opportunities, job training, drug
and alcohol counseling for the entire family, and clergy intervention.
"Just as intensive as the surveillance by probation and police
is the supportive service component delivered by the streetworkers,"
says Post. "In a way they are the youth partners advocates.
They visit kids in their homes, refer them to recreational or employment
opportunities, take them to games or to church, meet with their
parents and get involved with the whole family." Streetworkers
also meet with probation officers regularly to compare perspectives
and develop appropriate interventions.
The Healing Hands Working Group in Baltimore provides triage for
those wanting help. It determines what services are available and
helps get the youth connected to them, even physically connecting
them by providing transportation.
Safe and Sound's role
The respective Safe and Sound organizations in Baltimore and Philadelphia
took the lead in deciding to pursue the strategy and for putting
together their coalitions, which they co-chair. "Given the
nature and magnitude of the problem in Philadelphia (118 homicides
of people aged 24 and under in 1999) Safe and Sound wanted to put
its effort into something with demonstrated success," says
Post.
"Plus, we broker relationships among the multiple agencies
needed to pull it off," she adds. "We find ways to support
and resource the effort. As needs present themselves, Safe and Sound
responds. For example, we secured a grant and a match to pay for
the streetworkers, we identified clergy to participate, we identify
and find needed ancillary services like visiting nurses, we gather
and analyze a lot of data."
Lessons learned
Both of these efforts are just underway and involve specific neighborhoods,
and both will expand geographically over time. Meanwhile, important
lessons have already been learned:
New roles. "This involves a significantly different role for
probation officers," says Post. "They are usually an arm
of law enforcement, but in this effort not only do they join in
the intensive surveillance and supervision, they also fill a social
service role by assessing needs and matching those in their caseload
with appropriate programs." Post believes it would have helped
to start the training for these new roles earlier.
Constituency building. Homicides are weapons-driven, so suppressing
gun availability is a big issue, notes Post. However, in Pennsylvania
even the most minimal gun control measures have failed. However
the newly elected leadership in Philadelphia has joined other cities
in their suit against gun manufacturers. "We need to raise
public awareness, build more of a constituency around the issue
and embrace communities outside Philadelphia," she says.
Security. "Members of the targeted community eagerly joined
in the planning, but when the strict law enforcement and the call-in
occurred, we found that they were not quite as ready to digest the
approach," says Ferebee. "In people's minds questions
arose like, 'Am I a snitch, and does that make me vulnerable?' People
have to be secure that perpetrators will be prosecuted and sentenced
and not back on the street."
Fairness. "The job of the police is to make arrests, but the
community has to trust that it's done fairly," says Ferebee.
"Law enforcement makes the promise that the strict enforcement
will be fair, respectful and vigorous, and will involve sound detective
work, prosecution and sentencing."
So far, officials in both cities are optimistic and encouraged.
"Violence is so severe in some communities that it impedes
many other things we'd like to do to improve the health and safety
of children," says Ferebee. "Now, there's a buzz about
this, and it's galvanized the community around a common effort."
|